Ελληνική Βιβλιογραφία

• Αθανασίου Α,, «Το φύλο στους λόγους και τις πρακτικές της βιο-επιστήμης: Επιστημολογίες και τεχνολογίες του έμφυλου σώματος», στο συλλογικό τόμο Το φύλο. Βιβλιογραφικές επισκοπήσεις, επιμ. Βενετία Καντσά, Βασιλική Μουτάφη και Ευθύμιος Παπαταξιάρχης. Αθήνα: Αλεξάνδρεια (υπό έκδοση).

• Γκέφου-Μαδιανού Δ.(1998), “Αναστοχασμός, ετερότητα και ανθρωπολογία οίκοι: Διλήμματα και αντιπαραθέσεις.” στο Δ. Γκέφου-Μαδιανού (επιμ.) Ανθρωπολογική θεωρία και εθνογραφία. Σύγχρονες τάσεις, 365–435. Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα.

• Γκέφου-Μαδιανού Δ.(1999) Πολιτισμός και Εθνογραφία: Από τον Εθνογραφικό Ρεαλισμό στην Πολιτισμική κριτική, Ελληνικά Γράμματα. Αθήνα.

• Γκέφου-Μαδιανού Δ. (2006), Εννοιολογήσεις του εαυτού και του «Άλλου»: ζητήματα ταυτότητας στη σύγχρονη ανθρωπολογική θεωρία, ατο Εαυτός και «Άλλος»: Εννοιολογήσεις, Ταυτότητες και Πρακτικές στην Ελλάδα και στην Κύπρο, Γκέφου0-Μαδιανού Δ. (επιμ.), Gutemberg, Αθήνα: 15-110.

• Ελληνική Δημοκρατία, 1981, Ν. 1143, Περί ειδικής αγωγής, ειδικής επαγγελματικής εκπαιδεύσεως, απασχολήσεως και κοινωνικής μερίμνης των αποκλινόντων εκ του φυσιολογικού ατόμων και άλλων τινών εκπαιδευτικών διατάξεων,Φ.Ε.Κ 80, τ. Α’

• Ελληνική Δημοκρατία,1982, Π.Δ 603, Οργάνωση και Λειτουργία Ειδικών Σχολείων, Φ.Ε.Κ 117 τ. Α’

• Ελληνική Δημοκρατία(1985), Νόμος 1566, Δομή και Λειτουργία της Ειδικής Αγωγής και άλλες διατάξεις, Φ.Ε.Κ 167/85.

• Ελληνική Δημοκρατία,2000, Νόμος 2817, Εκπαίδευση των Ατόμων με Ειδικές Εκπαιδευτικές Ανάγκες και άλλες διατάξεις, Φ.Ε.Κ Α’ 78/14.03.2000.

• Ελληνική Δημοκρατία (2008), Νόμος 3699: Ειδική Αγωγή και Εκπαίδευση Ατόμων με Αναπηρία ή Ειδικές Εκπαιδευτικές Ανάγκες. Φ.Ε.Κ 199 τ. Α΄’/2-10+2008.

• Ζώνιου-Σιδέρη Α.(1996), Οι Ανάπηροι και η Εκπαίδευσή τους, Ελληνικά Γράμματα, Αθήνα.

• Ζώνιου-Σιδέρη(2000), Ένταξη, Ουτοπία ή Πραγματικότητα; Η εκπαιδευτική και πολιτική διάσταη της ένταξης μαιθητών με ειδικές ανάγκες, Ελληνικά Γράμματα, Αθήνα.

• Hollins Etta (2007) Ο Πολιτισμός στη Σχολική Μάθηση, Μεταίχμιο, Αθήνα.

• Νικόδημος Στ. (1992), Αγωγή και Εκπαίδευση των Παιδιών με Ειδικές Ανάγκες ατην Ελλάδα: Γενικές διαπιστώσεις, σύγχρονες τάσεις-προοπτικές, στο Καϊλα Μ, Πολεμικού Ν., Φιλίππου Γ., Άτομα με Ειδικές Ανάγκες.Εισηγήσεις, Ανακοινώσεις στο Διεπιστηιμονικό Ευρωπαϊκό Συμπόσιο «Άτομα με Ειδικές Ανάγκες. Σύγχρονες Κατευθύνσεις και Απόψεις σε Προβλήματα Πρόληψης,Παρέμβασης και Αντιμετώπισης, Παννεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου, Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα και Ελληνική Ψυχολογική Εταιρεία, Ρόδος, Ελληνικά Γράμματα 1994, σελ. 624-5.

• Παπαγαρουφάλη Ε.(2002) Δώρα Ζωής Μετά Θάνατον: Πολιτισμικές Εμπειρίες. Ελληνικά Γράμματα, Αθήνα.

• Pirandello L.,2007[1922], Έξι Πρόσωπα Ζητούν Συγγραφέα, μτφ. Ερίκος Μπελιές, Ηριδανός.

• Σταγάκη Φ. (2007), Αναπηρία και Ειδικές Εκπαιδευτικές Ανάγκες: Προσεγγίζοντας τη διαφορετικότητα στην εκπαίδευση. Εισήγηση στο Σεμινάριο του Συμβουλίου για την Εκπαίδευση στην Κοινωνική Εργασία (ΣΕΚΕ): Η Οικογένεια και το Σχολείο, η σημερινή τους δυναμική και οι μελλοντικές τους προοπτικές ως πρόκληση για την Κοινωνική Εργασία, Εθνική Σχολή Δημόσιας Διοίκησης, 8-11 Νοεμβρίου, Αθήνα.

• Στασινός Δ.(1984), Ο Αντί 309 και η Ειδική Αγωγή, Αντί, τεύχος 262: 367.

• Τεντόμας Λ. (2007), Μία Εθνογραφική Έρευνα των Εμπειριών Μαθητών με Αναπηρίες για την Σχολική τους Ζωή σε ένα Ειδικό Σχολείο Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης στην Ελλάδα. Εισήγηση στο Σεμινάριο του Συμβουλίου για την Εκπαίδευση στην Κοινωνική Εργασία (ΣΕΚΕ): Η Οικογένεια και το Σχολείο, η σημερινή τους δυναμική και οι μελλοντικές τους προοπτικές ως πρόκληση για την Κοινωνική Εργασία, Εθνική Σχολή Δημόσιας Διοίκησης, 8-11 Νοεμβρίου, Αθήνα.

• Υπουργείο Παιδείας-Παιδαγωγικό Ινστιτούτο (2004), Χαρτογράφηση της Ειδικής Αγωγής. Αναλυτικά προγράμματα σπουδών Ειδικής Αγωγής στο http://www.pischools.gr/special_education/index.php ημερ. διάπλευσης 20/1/2008..

• Χαϊπάρογλου Α., (2007),’Εφηβοι σε Ρήξη με το Νόμο: Όψεις της Παραβατικότητας των Ανηλίκων στην Ελλάδα, Διδακτορική Διατριβή, Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο, Τμήμα Κοινωνικής Ανθρωπολογίας, Αθήνα.

• Χατζούλη Α. (2009), Νέα γενετική, κοινωνία και πολιτισμός. Η πρόσληψη της γενετικής πληροφορίας και η πολιτισμική διαμεσολάβησή της. Η περίπτωση της μεσογειακής αναιμίας΄. Διδακτρορική Διατριβή, Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου, Σχολή Κοινωνικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Ιατορίας και Κοινωνικής Ανθρωπολογίας, Μυτιλήνη.

Ξενόγλωσση Βιβλιογραφία

• Abberley, P. (1987) On the Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability, Disability & Society, 2.1, pp. 5–20.

• Abberley, P. 1992. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability, στο: Booth, T., Swain, W., Masterton, M. & Potts, P. (Eds) Learning for All 2_ Policies for diversity in education (London, Routledge/Open University Press).

• Abberley, P. 1993. Disabled people and ‘normality’. In Disabling barriers – enabling environments ,ed. J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, and M. Oliver, 107–15. London: Sage.

• Abberly, P. (1992). Counting us out: A discussion of the OPCS Disability Surveys, Disability, Handicap & Society,7(2): 139-156.

• Ablon J. 1981 Stigmatized Health Conditions. Social Science and Medicine 15b: 59.

• Ablon J 1984 Little People in America: The Social Dimensions of Dwarfism. New York: Praeger.

• Ablon J. 1992 Social Dimensions of Genetic Disorders. Practicing Anthropology 14(1):10-13.

• Ablon J. 1994 Reflections on Fieldwork with Little People of America: Myths and Methods. In Others Knowing Others: Perspectives on Ethnographic Careers. Don. D. Fowler and Donald L. Hardesty, eds. Pp. 195-210. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

• Ablon J. 1999 Living with Genetic Disorder: The Impact of Neurofibromatosis 1. Westport, CT: Auburn House, Greenwood Press

• Ablon J. 2002 The Nature of Stigma and Medical Conditions. Epilepsy and Behavior 3:6 Suppl. 2:2-9.

• Achino-Loeb Maria-Luisa 2004, Agency in Emotions Notes on Three Perspectives from an Anthropologist’s Eye, Theory Psychology : 14(4), 554-561.

• Adams J., Swain J., Clark J.,(2000), What’s so special? Teachers’ models and their realization in practice in segregated schools, Disability and Society, 15(2), 233-46.

• Adler, P. A. and P. Adler (1987) Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• Ahmed S., 2004, The Cultural Politics of Emotions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

• Alderson, P. & Goodey, C. (1998), Doctors, ethics and special education. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24, 49–55.

• Alderson, P. & Goodey, C. (1999) Enabling Education: experiences in special and ordinary schools (London, Tufnell Press).

• Allan, Julie .1996. Foucault and Special Educational Needs: a ‘box of tools’ for analysing children’s experiences of mainstreaming. Disability & Society, 11:2, 219 – 234.

• American Anthropological Association(1998),Code of Ethics of the A.A.A.

• Andersen Kerstrom, N. & Kjaer P. .1996. Institutional Construction and Change: an analytical strategy of Institutional History, COS rapport no 5 (Copenhagen, COS).

• Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spreadof nationalism. New York: Verso.

• Anspach, R. 1979 From Stigma to Identity: Political Activism among the Physically Disabled and Former Mental Patients. Social Science and Medicine 13a:765-772

• Anyon, J. (1981), Social class and school knowledge.Curriculum Inquiry. 11:3–42.

• Apple, M. ed. (1982), Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education: Essays on Class, Ideology and the State. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.

• Apple, M. W. (1993) The Politics of Official Knowledge: Does a National Curriculum Make Sense?, Teachers College Record, 95Ι3),:. 222–241.

• Apple, M. W. (1996) Cultural Politics and Education (Buckingham, Open University Press).

• Armstrong, F., Armstrong, D. and Barton, L. (2000) Inclusive Education: Policy, Contexts and ComparativePerspectives (London: David Fulton).

• Armstrong, M. Jocelyn & Fitzgerald, Maureen H., (1996), Culture and Disability Studies: An anthropological perspective. Rehabilitation Education, 10(4), pp. 247-304.

• Asad, T. (1986) The concept of cultural translation in British Social Anthropology, in: G. Marcus & J. Clifford (Eds) Writing Culture, pp. 141–164 (Berkley, University of California Press).

• Astin, A. W. (1992) Education ‘choice’: its appeal may be illusory. Sociology of Education, 65, 255–260.

• Athanassiou Athena(2006), Bloodlines: Performing the Body of the “Demos,” Reckoning the Time of the “Ethnos”, Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 24, 229-256.

• Avramidis, E, & Kalyva, E. (2007) ‘The influence of teaching experience and professional development on Greek teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion’, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22:4, 367 _ 389

• Bakhtin, M., 1984[1940] Rabelais and His World. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

• Bakhtin, M.M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Trans. V. W. McGee (Austin, University of Texas Press).

• Barbas, G., Birbili M., Stagiopoulos P., Tzivinikou S. (2006), A pilot study of factors affecting the process of integration in Greek Nursery Schools, European Journal of Special Needs Education , 21(2), pp 217-226.

• Barnes, C. 1992. Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of Media Representations of Disabled People, Belper: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People.

• Barnes, C. (1996) Disability and the myth of the independent researcher, Disability& Society, 11,pp. 107–110.

• Barnes, C. (2003). Reflections on emancipatory research. Disability & Society 18, no. 1: 3–17.

• Barnes, C., Mercer G., and Shakespeare T.. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

• Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (Eds.). (1997). Doing disability research. Leeds: The Disability Press.

• Barnes C. Mercer G. Sheldon A. 2003. Culture, Disability and the Media, στο Culture, Researching Disability and Changing Practice, Πανεπιστημιακές παραδόσεις για το Master on Disability Studies, Dept of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, UK.

• Barnes, C. & Sheldon A.(2005), Theories and Definitions of Disability, cd rom for Module one, MA in Disability Studies, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, UK,

• Barton L. (1997), The Policy of Special Educational Needs, in Disability Studies: Past, Present, and Future, (eds) Balton Len, Oliver Mike, Leeds, The Disability Press, pp 138-159.

• Barton, L. (1996). Inclusion: An Emancipatory Project or a Counter-Productive Discourse? Paper presented at the Culture, Difference and Inclusion, 16th – 19th February 1996, Rutland Hotel, Sheffield.

• Barton, L. (ed.) (2001) Disability, politics and the struggle for change (London, David Fulton).

• Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust (Cambridge, Polity).

• Bax, M. (1999). Joining the mainstream. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41(3), 115–123.

• Beatty, A. 2005a, ‘Emotions in the Field: What Are We Talking About?’, Journal of Τhe Royal Anthropological Institute 11(1): 17–37.

• Beatty, A. 2005b. ‘Feeling Your Way in Java: An Essay on Society and Emotion’, Ethnos 70(1): 53–78.

• Becker, Gay 1980 Growing Old in Silence: Deaf People in Old Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

• Benedict, R. (1934), Anthropology and the Abnormal, The Journal of General Psychiatry, 10, pp. 59-80.

• Ben-Ze’ev Aaron 2000, The Subtlety of Emotions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

• Berlant, L. 2000. ‘The Subject of True Feeling: Pain, Privacy and Politics’, pp. 33–47 in S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil and B. Skeggs (eds) Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism. London: Routledge.

• Bird, L. (1999) Towards a more critical educational psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 1(1), 21–33.

• Bond G. C. (2000), Contested Terrains and Constructed Categories: Contemporary African in Focus. Boulder, CO; Oxford, UK: Westview.

• Booth, T. & Booth, W. (1998). Parenting under pressure. Buckingham: Open University Press.

• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Bourdieu, P. 1992. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

• Bourdieu, P. 1993. The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.

• Bourdieu, P. Passeron J-C. (1977), Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, transl. R Nice. London; Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

• Boutskou, E. (2007), The role of special education teachers in primary schools in Greece, International Studies in Sociology of Education 17(3): 289–302.

• Bratlinger E. A., (1999), Inward gaze and activism as moral new steps in inquiry. Anthropology of Education Quarterly, 30(4):413–29.

• Brawn, H. & Snith, H. 1989. Whose community, whose care? in: A. BRECHIN & J.WALMSLEY (Eds) Making Connections: reflecting on the lives and experiences of people with learning difficulties, pp. 230–232 (London, Hodder & Stoughton).

• Breivik, J.K. 2005. Deaf identities in the making: Local lives, transnational Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

• Brennan Teresa,2004, The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: University of Cornell Press.

• Britzman, D. (2003). Practice Makes Practice, a Critical Study of Learning to Teach. Albany: SUNY Press.

• Brown, H. 1994. An ordinary sexual life? A review of the ‘normalization principal as it applies to the sexual options of people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society 9, no. 2: 123–44.

• Bruner, Jerome, 1990, Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

• Bryant, R. (2001). An aesthetics of self: moral remaking and the Cypriot education. In Comparatove studies of Social History,43(3):583–614.

• Burns, J. 1992. Normalisation through the looking glass. Clinical Psychology Forum 39:22–4.

• Burrow S. 2005, The Political Structure of Emotion: From Dismissal to Dialogue, Hyoatia, 20(4): 27-38.

• Butler, C. (2001). Evidence tables and reviews of treatment outcomes. In A. Scherzer (Ed.), Early diagnosis and intervention therapy in cerebral palsy (3rd ed., pp. 314–330). New York: Marcel Dekker.

• Butler, J. (1999). New preface to Gender trouble, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.

• Butler, J. (1993), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.

• Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.

• Campbell S. (1994). Being dismissed: The politics of emotional expression. Hypatia9 (3): 46–65.

• Campbell S. (1997). Interpreting the personal. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

• Campbell, A. (1996) Tricky tropes; styles of the popular and pompous, in: J.MACCLANCY & C. MCDONAUGH (Eds) Popularising Anthropology, pp. 58–82 (London, Routledge).

• Campbell, A.T. (1995) Getting to Know Waiwai: an Amazonian ethnography (London, Routledge).

• Campbell, J. and Oliver, M. 1996. Disability politics: Understanding our past, changing our future. London: Routledge.

• Capper, D. (2003). ‘Scientific Empathy, American Buddhism, and the Ethnography of Religion’, Culture and Religion 4(2): 233–53.

• Cartwright, Corinna, and Sarah Wind-Cowie. (2005). Profound and multiple learning difficulties.London: Continuum.

• Cavet, J. (1998) Leisure and friendship, in: C. Robinson & K. Stalker (Eds) Growing up with disability (London, Jessica Kingsley).

• Chambers, (2001) E.* Applied Ethnography, in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

• Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded Theory. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. V. Langenhove (Ed.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: sage.

• Cho, Julia (1997), “Sideshow Freaks and Sexualized Children: Abject Bodies on Display.” Critical Sense 5(2):18–52.

• Chodorow Nancy J.(1999). The Power of Feelings: Personal Meaning inPsychoanalysis, Gender, and Culture. New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity Press.

• Clark, C., Dyson, A., Milward, A. and Robson, S. (1999) Inclusive education and schools as organizations. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3, 37–52.

• Clegg, J. & Lansdall-Welfare R, (2003), Death, Disability and Dogma, PPP, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 10(1): 67-79.

• Clifford, J. (1986) On ethnographic allegory, in: G.E. MARCUS & J. CLIFFORD (Eds) Writing Culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 98–121 (Berkeley, University of California Press).

• Code, L. (2000). How to think globally: Stretching the limits of the imagination. In Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feministworld, ed. Uma Narayan and Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana UniversityPress.

• Coffey, A. and Delamont S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and change. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

• Cohen, L. (1998) No aging in India: Alzheimer’s, the bad family, and other modern things, Berkeley University of California Press.

• Cole, M. (2006),Education, Equality and Human Rights,Routledge,UK. Collins, R. 1979. The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.

• Connors, C. & Stalker, K. (2007). Children’s experiences of disability: pointers to a social model of childhood disability, Disability and Society, 22(1), pp. 19-33.

• Connors, C., & Stalker, K. (2003). The views and experiences of disabled children and their siblings: A positive outlook. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

• Corker, M. 1998. Deaf and disabled or deafness disabled? Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.

• Corker, M. (1999a) New disability discourse, the principle of optimisation and social change, in M. Corker & S. FRrench (Eds) Disability Discourse, pp. 192–209 (Buckingham, Open University Press).

• Corker, M. (1999b) Deaf authors and readers: death, rebirth and Bakhtins dialogics, in: S. Snyder, B.J. Brueggemann & R.G. Thomson (Eds) Enabling the Humanities: a sourcebook for Disability Studies in Language and Literature (New York, MLA Press).

• Corker, M. (1999c). Differences, conflations, and foundations: The limits to ‘accurate’ theoretical representation of disabled people’s experience? Disability and Society 14(5), 627-642.

• Corker, M. (1999d) They Don’t Know What They Don’t Know—disability research as an ‘emancipatory’ site of learning, Sites of Learning Conference, University of Hull, September.

• Corker, M. (2000) The UK Disability Descrimination Act—disabling language, justifying inequitable social participation, in: A. Silvers & F. Lrsley Americans with Disabilities: Implications of the law for individuals and institutions (New York, Routledge).

• Corker, M. 2001. Sensing Disability, Hypatia, 16(4):34-53.

• Corker, M. & Shakespeare, T. (2002) Mapping the Terrain, in: M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (eds), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (London, Continuum), pp. 1–17.

• Corker, M., and J.M. Davis. 2000. Disabled children – invisible under the law. Στο¨ Disabilityand the law, ed. J. Cooper and S. Vernon. London: Jessica Kingsley.

• Coupe O’Kane, Judith, and Juliet Goldbart. 1998. Communication before speech: Development and assessment. 2nd ed. London: David Fulton.

• Crapanzano, V. (1986) Hermes dilemma: the masking of subversion in ethnographic description, in: G.E.Marcus & J. Clifford (Eds) Writing Culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 51–76 (Berkeley, University of California Press).

• Creswell, J. W. & Miller, D. L. (2000) Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

• Csordas, T. 1990. ‘Embodiment as a Paradigm for Anthropology’, Ethos 18(1): 5–47.

• Csordas, T., ed. 1994 Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge University Press.

• Cvetkovich, A. 1992. Mixed Feelings: Feminism, Mass Culture and VictorianSensationalism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

• Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt.

• Davidson, A. (1986) Archaeology, genealogy, ethics, στο: Hoy, D. (Ed.) Foucault: a critical reader (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).

• Davis, J. M.,(2000), Disability Studies as Ethnographic Research and Text: research strategies and roles for promoting social change? Disability & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2000, pp. 191–206

• Davis, J., Hogan J., (2004), Research with Children: Ethnography, participation, disability, self-empowerment, in Barnes C, Mercer G., Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Practice, Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, pp 172-190.

• Davis, J.M. & Watson, N. (1999) Challenging the Stereotypes: disabled children and resistance, Sites of Learning Conference, Centre for the Social Study of Childhood, University of Hull, 14-17 September.

• Davis, J.Μ. & Watson, N. (2001). Where are the children’s experiences? Analysing social and cultural exclusion in “special” and “mainstream” schools. Disability and Society, 16(5), 671–687.

• Davis, J.Μ. & Watson, N. & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2000). Learning the lives of disabled children: Developing a reflexive approach in Conducting research with children A. James and P. Christensen, (Editors) London: Falmer.

• Davis, L. J. (2002). Bending over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism, and Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York UP.

• De Sousa, R. U(1997). The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge: MIT P.

• Dean M. (1994). A social structure of many souls: Moral regulation, government, and self-formation. Canadian Journal of Sociology 19(2): 145–68.

• Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, Continuum. delivery modes, European Journal of Special Needs Education 21(2), pp. 201–216.

• Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard. Educational Review, 58(3):280–98.

• Denzin, N. (1997) Interpretive ethnography: ethnographic practices for the twenty-first century. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

• Derrida, J. (1982). Signature event context, xxix, μτφ: Alan Bass (Brighton, Harvester Press), in: Margins of Philosophy (Chicago, IL).

• Derrida, J. (1995). Difference. In P.A. Moody (Ed), Readings in textual studies (pp. 112–120). Acton, MA: Copley Custom Publishing House.

• Deshen, Shlomo,(1992), Blind People: The private and public lives of sightless Israelis. State University of New York Press: Albany.

• Deshong S. (2007), The Nightmare of Health: Metaphysics and Ethics in the Signification of Disability, Symbloke, 15 (1-2): 268-286.

• Deslandes J. (2004). A Philosophy of Emoting, Journal of Narrative Theory 34.3 (Fall): 335–372.

• Dolby N. (2001). Constructing Race: Youth, Identity and Popular Culture in South Africa. Albany: SUNY Press.

• Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special education and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

• Dorries, B. & Haller, B. (2001). The news of inclusive education: A narrative analysis. Disability and Society, 16(6), 871–891.

• Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow, P. (1986). What is maturity? Habermas and Foucault on `What is enlightenment?’ στο: Hoy, D. (Ed.) Foucault: a critical reader (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).

• Durkheim, E. (1963). Primitive Classifications (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).

• Eddy, E. (1985). Theory, research and application in educational anthropology. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 83–104.

• Edgerton, R. B. (1970). Mental Retardation in Non-Western Societies: Toward a cross-cultural perspective on incompetence. In H. C. Haywood (ed.), Social-Cultural Aspects of Mental Retardation, 523-559. Meredith Corporation: New York.

• Edgerton, R. B.,(1967),The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded. University of California Press: Berkeley.

• Edgerton, Robert (1993) The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the Lives of the Mentally Retarded, revised. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.

• Eisner, E. W. (1999) Educational reform and the ecology of schooling. In A. C. Ornstein and L. S. Behar- Horenstein (eds), Contemporary Issues in Curriculum (Boston: Allyn & Bacon), 403–415.

• Ellis, C., and A. P. Bochner. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 733-68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

• Erevelles N. (2002). Voices of Silence: Foucault, Disability, and the Question of Self-determination, Study in Philosophy and Education, 21: 17-35.

• Erevelles, N. (1996). Disability and the dialectics of difference. Disability and Society,11(4), 519–537.

• Erevelles, N. *(2000). Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory, 50(1), 25–47.

• Evans, J. and Lunt, I. (2002) Inclusive education: are there limits? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 1–14.

• Everhart R. (1983). Reading, Writing and Resistance:Adolescence and Labour in a Junior High School. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.

• Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change (Cambridge, Polity).

• Fajans Jane,(2006), Autonomy and Relatedness Emotions and the Tension between Individuality and Sociality, Critique of Anthropology, 26(1): 103-119.

• Farnell, B. (1999). ‘Moving Bodies, Acting Selves’, Annual Review of Anthropology 28:341–73.

• Finkelstein, V. (1975) To deny or not deny disability, Magic Carpet, 28, pp. 31–38.

• Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people: Issues for discussion. Ανάκτηση 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2006 από http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/

• Finkelstein, V. (1996). The disability movement has run out of steam. Disability Now, February, 11.

• Finkelstein, V. (2001). The Social Model of Disability Ανάκτηση 15 Σεπτεμβρίου, 2007 από fhttp://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/finkelstein/

• Finkelstein, V. 1980. Attitudes and ‘disabled’ people: Issues for discussion. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.

• Finkelstein, V. (2003). The social model of disability repossessed. Leeds University.www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/finkelstein/soc%20mod%20repossessed.pdf.finkelstein/attitudes.pdf

• Fischer, M.J. (1986) Ethnicity and the post-modern arts of memory, in: G.E. Marcus & J. Clifford J. (Eds) Writing Culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 194–232 (Berkeley, University of California Press).

• Florian L., Hollenweger J., Simeonsson R. J., Wedell K., Riddell S., Terzi L., Holland A. ,(2006), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Classification of Children with Disabilities: Part I. Issues in the Classification of Children with Disabilities, Journal of Special Education.: 40(1): 36-57.

• Florian, L. (1998) An examination of the practical problems associated with the implementation of inclusive education policies. Support for Learning, 13, 105–108.

• Foley, D. (1977). Anthropological studies of schooling in developing countries: some recent findings and trends. Comparative Education Review. 21:311–28.

• Foley, D. (1991). Rethinking school ethnographies of colonial settings: a performance perspective of reproduction and resistance. Comparative Education Revew 35(3):532–51.

• Forsythe, D. (1999). Ethics and politics of studying up in technoscience. Anthropology of Work Review, 20(1):6-11, Special Issue: Working for them: Essays in honor of Diana Forsythe. L. Hogle and G. Downey, Guest Editors.

• Foster, M. 1995. Talking that talk: the language of control, curriculum and critique. Linguistic Education 7:129–50. Foucault M. 1977b. Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison (Harmondsworth, Penguin).

• Foucault,M. 1973a. The Birth of the Clinic (London, Tavistock).

• Foucault,M. 1973b. The order of things: an archaeology of human sciences (New York, Vintage

• Foucault, M. (1977a). Intellectuals and power: a conversation between Michel Foucault and Giles Deleuze, στο: Bouchard, D. (Ed.) Language, Counter-memory, Practice: selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).

• Foucault M. 1977b. Discipline and Punish: the birth of the prison (Harmondsworth, Penguin).

• Foucault M. (1980). Two lectures. Στο Power/knowledge, selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon,78–108. London: Harvester Press.

• Foucault, M. (1983) The Subject and Power, in: H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow, Michel Foucualt, Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press), pp. 208–228.

• Foucault M. (1984). Space knowledge power. Στο The Foucaultreader, ed. P Rabinow, 239–56. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

• Foucault M. (1997). The birth of biopolitics στο: Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity and truth.Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press.

• Foucault, M,(1998). “Different Spaces.” Trans. Robert Hurley. Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Vol. 2 of Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. James D. Faubion. New York: New P, :175-85.

• Frank, G. (2000) Venus On Wheels: Two Decades of Dialogue On Disability, Biography, and Being Female in America Berkeley, University of California Press.

• French, S. (1993). ‘Can you see the rainbow?’ The roots of denial. In Disabling barriers – enabling environments, ed. J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, and M. Oliver, 69–77. London: Sage.

• Frosh, S. (1999). The politics of psychoanalysis. London: Macmillan.

• Gabel, S. (2004). South Asian Indian Cultural Orientations Toward Mental Retardation. Mental Retardation 42(1), 12-25.

• Gabel, S., & Peters, S. (2004). Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward a resistance theory of disability. Disability and Society 19(6), 571-596.

• Gartner, A. and Lipsky, D.K. (2000) ‘Inclusion and school restructuring: A new synergy’, στο R.A. Villa και J.S. Thousand (eds) Restructuring for Caring and Effective Education, : 38–55. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

• Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures (New York, Basic Books).

• Gefou-Madianou, Dimitra (1993) “Mirroring Ourselves Through Western Texts: The Limits of An Indigenous Anthropology”. In The Politics of Ethnographic Reading and Writing: Confrontations of Western and Indigenous Views, edited by Henk Driessen, 160–181. Saarbrucken and Fort Lauderdale: Verlag Breitenbach Publisher.

• Gems, D. (2005) Plus Ultra! Or: To Enhance or Not to Enhance? Συμπληρωματική έκδοση του TimesHigher Education Supplement, August 20th 2005.

• Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J. and Bowe, R. (1995) Markets, Choice and Equity in Education (Buckingham: Open University Press).

• Ghai A. (2002) Disability in the Indian context: Post-colonial perspectives. In M. Corker and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory, 88-100. London/New York: Continuum.

• Ghai, A. (2003). (Dis)Embodied forms: Issues of disabled women. New Delhi, India: Shakti Books.

• Ghai, A.. 2006. Education in a globalising era: Implications for ‘disabled’ girls. Social Change 36, no. 3: 161–76.

• Giangreco, M., Edelman, S., Broer, S. & Doyle, M. B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 45–63.

• Giangreco, M.F., Cloninger,C.J., Dennis, R.E. και Edelman, S.W. (2000) ‘Problem solving to facilitate inclusive education’, στο R.A. Villa και J.S. Thousand (eds) Restructuring for Caring and Effective Education, : 293–327. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes

• Gieser Thorste, (2008), Embodiment, emotion and empathy A phenomenological approach to apprenticeship learning Anthropological Theory 8(3): 299-318.

• Gilbert T, (2003), Exploring the dynamics of power: a Foucauldian analysis of care planning in learning disabilities services, Nursing Inquiry , 10(1): 37–46

• Gilbert T. (2000). Social welfare, care planning and the politics of trust. PhD thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes.

• Gilbert T. (2001). Reflective practice and clinical supervision: meticulous rituals of the confessional. Journal of AdvancedNursing 36(2): 199–205.

• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

• Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture and process of schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

• Gleason, J. J., (1994), Theoretical Framework for What Persons with Severe and Profound Multiple Disabilities Do in Context. In Marcia H. Rioux & Michael Bach (eds.), Disability Is Not Measles, 245-263. L’Institut Roeher Institute: Ontario.

• Gleason, John Joseph, (1989), Special Education in Context: An ethnographic study of persons with developmental disabilities. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

• Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka, eds. (2002) Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

• Goffman, E.(1963) Stigma: Notes on Management of Spoiledldentity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

• Gold Gerald, (2003), Rediscovering place: experiences of a quadriplegic Anthropologist, The Canadian Geographer, 47(4):467–479

• Gold, G. (2001). Searching for the cure: Virtual disability and collective action in an electronic support group. In L. Rogers & B. Swadener (Editors), Semiotics and Disability: Interrogating categories of difference, pp. 43-54 New York SUNY Press.

• Gonzalez N. (2004), Disciplining the Discipline: Anthropology and the Pursuit of Quality Education , Educational Researcher, 33(5):. 17–25

• Goode, David A., (1980a), Behavioural Sculpting: Parent-child interactions in families with retarded children. In Jerry Jacobs (ed.), Mental Retardation: A phenomenological approach, 95-118. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield, Illinois.

• Goode, David A., (1980b), The World of the Congenitally Deaf-Blind: Toward the grounds for achieving human understanding. In Jerry Jacobs (ed.), Mental Retardation: A phenomenological approach, 187-207. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield, Illinois.

• Goodley D. (2007). Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies. Disability & Society 11(3): 317-334.

• Goodley, D. (2006), Ethnography: a teaching resource, Manchester Metropolitan University Research Institute for Health and Social Change Division of Psychology and Social Change.

• Goodley, D. (2001) ‘Learning difficulties’, the social model of disability and impairment: challenging epistemologies. Disability and Society 16(2):201-231.

• Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the Lives of People with Learning Difficulties: The Politics of Resilience. Buckingham: Open University Press.

• Goodley, D. (1999), Disability Research and the “Researcher Template”: Reflections on Grounded Subjectivity in Ethnographic Research, Qualitative Inquiry, 5 (1), pp. 24-46.

• Goodley, D. & Moore, M. (2000). Doing Disability Research: Activist Lives and the Academy. Disability and Society, 15(6), 861–882.

• Goodley, D., & R. Lawthom. (2005). Epistemological journeys in participatory action research: Alliances between community psychology and disability studies. Disability & Society 20, no. 2: 135–53.

• Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Clough, P., & Moore, M. (2004). Researching life stories: Method, theory and analyses in a biographical age. London: Routledge Falmer Press.

• Goodley, D., Rapley M.,(2002), Changing the Subject: Postmodeernity and People with Learning Disabilities, in Corker M., Shakespeare T., Disability/Postmodernity, Embodying Disability Theory, The Cromwell Press, Great Britain, pp 127-142.

• Gordon, T., Holland, J. and Lahelma, E. (2001). Ethnographic Research in Educational Settings. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland and L. Lofland. (Eds.) Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.

• Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.

• Gupta Greenfield, P., H. Keller, A. Fuligni and A. Maynard 2003. ‘Cultural Pathways Through Universal Development’, Annual Review of Psychology 54: 461–90.

• Habermas, J. (1986) Taking aim at the heart of the present, in: Hoy, D. (Ed.) Foucault : a critical reader (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).

• Hacking I. (1999) The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

• Hahn, H. 1985 Towards a Politics of Disability: Definitions, Disciplines, and Politics. Social Science Journal 22:87-105.

• Haraway, D. (1988)_. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14: 575–99.

• Haraway, D. (1996), Modest witness: feminist diffractions in science studies’, στο The Disunity of the Sciences: Boundaries, Contexts and Power, eds P. Galison & D. J. Stamp, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

• Haraway, D. (1992), The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others, στο Cultural Studies , ed. P. Treichler, Routledge, New York.

• Haraway, D. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science , Routledge and Chapman Hall, London.΅

• Harris, N. (2002) Education law: excluding the child, Education and the Law, 12(1), 31–46.

• Harry, B. & Klingner, J. (2006), Why Are So Many Minority Students in Special Education? Understandng Race and Disability in Schools, Teachers College Press, Columbia University, U.S.A.

• Haualand, H., A. Gronningsaeter, and I.L.S. Hansen. (2003). Uniting divided worlds: A study of deaf and hard of hearing youth. Norway Centraltrykkeriet AS. Ημερομηνία ανάκτησης: 5-10-2008.

• Hayano, D. 1979, Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Human Organization 38:99-104.

• Hayano, D. (1982). Poker faces: The life and work of professional card players. Berkeley: University of California Press.

• Hedlund, M. (2000). ‘Disability as a Phenomenon: a discourse of social and biological understanding’, Disability & Society, 15(5): 765 – 780

• Hegarty, S. (2001). Inclusive education: A case to answer. Journal of Moral Education, 30(3), 243–249.

• Hehir, T. (2002). Eliminating ableism in education [Ηλεκτρονικό αρχείο]. Harvard Educational Review 72. Ανάκτηση September 30, 2008, http://gseweb.harvard. edu/~hepg/hehir.htm

• Heidegger, M. (1993). ‘Building Dwelling Thinking’, in D. Krell (ed.) Heidegger: Basic Writings, pp. 343–63. London: Routledge.

• Hemmingson, H., & Borell, L. (2002). Environmental barriers in mainstream schools. Child: Care, Health and Development, 28(1), 57–63.

• Herskovits, Elizabeth, and Linda Mitteness (1994) Transgressions and Sickness in Old Age. Journal of Aging Studies 8:327-340.

• Hewitt M. (1983). Bio-politics and social policy: Foucault’s account of welfare. Theory Culture and Society. 2(1): 67–84

• Hicks D. (1996). Discourse, Learning and Schooling. New York: Cambridge University Press.

• Ho A. (2004), To Be Labelled or not to Be, British Journal of Learning Difficulties,34:86-92.

• Hobbes, T. (1962) Leviathan, ed. M. Oakeshott. New York: Simon and Schuster.

• Hogle, L. & Downey, G. (1999). Introduction. Anthropology of Work Review, 20(1), 1-5, Special Issue: Working for them: Essays in honor of Diana Forsythe, L Hogle and G Downey, Guest Editors.

• Hughes, B. & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body, Disability & Society, 12, pp. 325–340.

• HughesS, P. (1999). The constitution of impairment: modernity and the aesthetic of oppression, Disability & Society, 14, pp. 155–172.

• Hume, D. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford.

• Hunt P. (1966), Stigma: The Exoerience of Disability. London: Geoffrey Chapman.

• Ingold, T. (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London and New York: Routledge.

• Ingstad, Benedict & Whyte Susan Reynolds (eds.), (1995), Disability and Culture. University of California Press: Berkeley.

• Iwakuma, M. (2002). “The Body as Embodiment: An Investigation of the Body by Merleau-Ponty.” Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Eds. Mairian Corker and Tom Shakespeare. London: Continuum : 76-87.

• Izard, C. (199)1. The Psychology of Emotions. New York: Plenum Press. Jackson, M. 1989. Paths Toward a Clearing: Radical Empiricism and Ethnographic Inquiry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

• Jackson, M. 1998. Minima Ethnographica: Intersubjectivity and the Anthropological Project. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

• Jenkins, Richard (ed.), (1998), Questions of Competence: Culture, classification and intellectual disability. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

• Jenkins, Richard, (1993), Incompetence and Learnig Difficulties, Anthropology Today, 9(3), pp. 16-20.

• Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and Social Representation (New York, Hawester Weathsheaf.

• Johnstone, D. (1995). Further opportunities: Learning difficulties and disabilities in further education. London: Cassell.

• Kant, I. (1981) Grounding for the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. J.W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.

• Kaplan, S. (1996). Education and the politics of national culture in a Turkish community circa 1990. PhD Diss., Univ. Chicago.

• Kasnitz, D. & Shuttleworth R. P. (2001). Anthropology and disability studies. In B. Swadener & L. Rogers (editors), Semiotics and dis/ability: Interrogating categories of difference(pp. 19-42). New York: SUNY Press.

• Kasnitz, D. (1991). Action anthropology and disability research. Paper presented at the Society for Disability Studies, San Francisco, CA.

• Kasnitz, D. (1995). Crossing boundaries between disability studies and medical anthropology. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

• Kasnitz, Devva & Shuttleworth, Russell P.,(1999), Engaging Anthropology in Disability Studies. Position Papers in Independent Living and Disability Policy 1(1): 1-39.

• Kelly, S. 2005 ‘Seeing Things in Merleau-Ponty’, in T. Carman and M. Hansen (eds) The Cambridge Compendium to Merleau-Ponty, pp. 74–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Kenworthy, J. & Whittaker, J. (2000). Anything to declare? The struggle for inclusive education and children’s rights. Disability and Society, 15(2), 219–231.

• Keogh, B. K., & MacMillan, D. L. (1996). Exceptionality. Στο: D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (: 311-330). New York: Simon Shuster/Macmillan.

• Kirby, P., & Woodhead, M. (2003). Children’s participation in society. In H. Montgomery, R. Burr, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Changing childhoods: Local and global (pp. 233–283).

• Kliewer, C. (1998). The meaning of inclusion. Mental Retardation, 36(4), 317–322.

• Klotz J. (2001), Denying intimacy: the role of reason and institutional order in the lives of people with an intellectual disability. PhD Thesis. Sydney, NSW, The University of Sydney.

• Knauf, B. (1996) Genealogies for the present in cultural anthropology. New York: Routledge.

• Koutrouba, K, Vamvakari, M. & Theodoropoulos, H. (2008)’SEN students’ inclusion in Greece: factors influencing Greek teachers’ stance’,European Journal of Special Needs Education,23:4,413 _ 421

• Kudlick, C. J. (2003) Disability History: Why do we need another ‘other’?, The American Historical Review, 108.3, pp. 763–793.

• Lacan, J. 1977. The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I. Écrits: A Selection. Μτφ: Alan Sheridan. New York: Norton.

• Ladenson R., (2005),,The zero-reject policy in special education: A moral analysis, Theory and Research in Education, 3(3): 273-298.

• Lather, E (1987) ‘Research as Praxis’, Harvard Educational Review, 56(3): 257-73.

• Lather, P. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and PedagogyWithin the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.

• Latour, B. (1988), The Pasteurization of France, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

• Latour, B. (1990). ‘Postmodern? No, Simply A Modern! Steps towards an anthropology of science’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science , 21.

• Lauder, H. and Hughes, D. (1999) Trading Futures: Why Markets in Education Don’t Work (Buckingham: Open University Press).

• Laville, S. (2005). Mother who killed son with Down’s syndrome gets suspended sentence. The Guardian, November 3. www.guardian.co.uk/uknew/story/0,3604,1607106,00. html. Ημερομηνία ανάκτησης 3-10-2007.

• Law, J. (1994), Organizing Modernity, Blackwell, Oxford.

• Leeman, Y. and Volman, M. (2001) Inclusive education: recipe book or quest. On diversity in the classroom and educational research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5, 367–380.

• Lenney M. & Sercombe H. (2002). ‘Did You See That Guy in the Wheelchair Down the Pub?’ Interactions across Difference in a Public Place. Disability & Society, 17(1): 5-18, Lingis, A. 1994. Foreign Bodies. New York: Routledge.

• Lewis G. (2000). Introduction: Expanding the social policy imaginary. Στο Rethinking social policy, eds G Lewis, S Gewirtz κσι J Clarke, 1–21. London: Open University/Sage Publications.

• Lightfoot, J., Wright, S. & Sloper, P. (1999). Supporting pupils in mainstream school with an illness or disability: Young people’s views. Child: Care, Health and Development, 25(4), 267–283.

• Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry (London, Sage).

• Linton S. (2005). What Is Disability udies?” PMLA 120 : 518-22.

• Littlewood R. (2005), Mental Health and Intellectial Disability Culture Diversity, Jounal of Intellectual Disability Research. 55: 555-560.

• Llewellyn, A. (2000). Perceptions of mainstreaming: A systems approach. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 42, 106–115.

• Lock, M. (1993). ‘Cultivating the Body: Anthropology and Epistemologies of Bodily Practice and Knowledge’, Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 133–55.

• Logan, Kent R., Heidi A. Jacobs, L. David Gast, Pamela D. Smith, Jackie Daniel, and Jo Ann Rawls. (2001). Preferences and reinforcers for students with profound multiple disabilities: Can we identify them? Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 13, no. 2: 97–122. London: David Fulton Publishers.

• Longmore P. & L. Umansky (2001) (eds) The New Disability History: American perspectives (New York, New York University Press).

• Low, J. (1996). Negotiating identities, negotiating environments: An interpretation of the experiences of students with ‘disabilities’. Disability and Society 11, no. 2: 235–48.

• Lundie D., (2007), A Theory of Motivation and Ontological Enhancement: The role of disability policy in student empowerment and institutional change, Educational Philosophy and Theory, :1-14.

• Lunt, I. and Norwich, B. (1999) Perspective on Education Policy. Can Effective Schools be Inclusive Schools?(London: Institute of Education University of London).

• Lutz, C. and G. White (1986). ‘The Anthropology of Emotions’, Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 405–36.

• MacMaster, K., Donovan, L. & MacIntyre, P. (2002) The effects of being diagnosed with a learning disability on children’s selfesteem. Child Study Journal, 32 (2): 101–8.

• Malinowski, B. (1965). The language of magic and gardening. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

• Manion, Mary L. & Bersani, Hank A. (1987). Mental Retardation as a Western Sociological Construct: A cross-cultural analysis, Disability, Handicap & Society 2(3), pp. 231-245.

• Marchand, T. (2001),. Minaret Building and Apprenticeship in Yemen. Richmond: Curzon.

• Marcus, G. & Fischer, M. (1986) Anthropology as a Cultural Critique (Chicago, Chicago University Press).

• Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.

• Marks, D. (2002). Introduction: Counselling, therapy and emancipatory praxis. Disability Studies Quarterly 22, no. 3: 1–5.

• Marti, G. (2005). A mosaic of believers: Diversity and innovation in a multiethnic church. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

• Martin, E. (1994), Flexible Bodies , Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

• Mason, M. (1992). Internalised oppression. In Disability equality in the classroom: A human rights issue, ed. R. Rieser and M. Mason. London: Disability Equality in Education.

• McDermott R, Varenne H,(1995) Culture “as” Disability,Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3): 324-348

• McDermott R, Varenne H,1995 Culture “as” Disability,Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3): 324-348

• McDowell, J. (1994) Mind and World ,Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

• McLaughlin, J. (2003). Feminist social and political theory: Contemporary debates and dialogues.London: Palgrave Macmillan.

• Mehan, H., and H. Wood. (1975). The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.

• Merleau-Ponty M. (1968)The Visible and the Invisible. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Ed. Claude Lefort. Evanston: Northwestern UP.

• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.

• Michalko, R. (1998). The mystery of the eye and the shadow of blindness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

• Michalko, R. (2002). The Difference Disability Makes. Philadelphia: Temple UP.

• Michell W.J.T.(2001), Seeing Disability, Public Culture 13(3) :391-397.

• Miller T. (1993). The well-tempered self: Citizenship, culture and thepostmodern subject. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UniversityPress.

• Milton, K. (2002). Loving Nature: Towards an Ecology of Emotion. London: Routledge.

• Minow M. (1990) Making all the difference: inclusion, exclusion, and American law. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

• Mol, A. (1998), Lived reality and the multiplicity of norms: a critical tribute to George Canguilhem, Economy and Society. 2 27(2 & 3): 274-284.

• Monaghan, P. (1998). Pioneering field of disability studies challenges established approaches and attitudes Chronicle of Higher Education. Ανάκτηση 25 Ιουνίου 2008 από http://www.uic.edu/orgs/sds/articles.html

• Morris, J. (1998). Don’t leave us out: Involving disabled children and young people with communication impairments. York, UK: York Publishing Services.

• Morris, J. (2003) Including all children: finding out about the experiences of disabled children “Leeds: Disability Archive. Retrived January 15 2007 from: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/morris/Including%20all%20children%20%20finding%20out%20about%20the%20experiences%20of%20disabled% 20children.pdf Morris, J. (Ed.) 1989. Able Lives: women’s experience of paralysis (London, Women’s Press).

• Morris, J. (1991). Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability, London: The Women’s Press.

• Morris, J. (1992). Personal and political: A feminist perspective on researching physical disability. Disability, Handicap and Society 7: 157–66.

• Morris, J. (1996). Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability. London: The Women’s Press.

• Moser I,, (2005), On becoming Disabledand Articulating Alternatives, Cultural Studies, 19(6): 667-700.Murphy, R. F. (1987). The body silent. New York: Norton.

• Najarian, C.G. (2006). Deaf mothers, maternal thinking and intersections of gender and ability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8, nos. 2–3: 99–120.

• Nash, R. J. (1974). The convergence of anthropology and education. Στο G. D. Spindler (Ed.), Educational and cultural process: Toward an anthropology of education: 5–25. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

• Neisser, U. (1976) Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.

• Norwich, B. & Kelly, N. (2004) Pupils’ views on inclusion: moderate learning difficulties and bullying in mainstream and special schools, British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 43–65.

• Norwich, B. (2008). ‘Dilemmas of difference, inclusion and disability: international perspectives on placement’,European Journal of Special Needs Education,23:4,287 _ 304

• Nussbaum Martha C. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Nussbaum, M. (2003) ‘Capabilities and disabilities: Justice for mentally retarded citizens’, Religion and Culture Web Forum. Ανάκτηση 22-2-2009 στο http://www.uchicago.edu/forum/index.php?=106

• Nutall, Mark, (1998), States and Categories: Indigenous Models of Personhood in Northwest Greenland, in Richard Jenkings (ed.), Questions of Competence: Culture, classification and Intellectual Disability, pp. 176-193, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

• Nye, A. (2000). “It’s not philosophy.” In Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world, ed. Uma Narayan and Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

• Okely, J. (1975) The self and scientism, Journal of the Anthropology Society of Oxford, 6, pp. 171–189.

• Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People (Basingstoke, Macmillan).

• Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement (Houndmills, Macmillan Education Ltd).

• Oliver, M. (1992) Changing the social relations of research production, Disability Handicap & Society, 7, pp. 101–114.

• Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: from theory to practice (Basingstoke, MacMillan).

• Oliver M.(1997) Emancipatory Research: Realistic goal or impossible dream? In Doing Disability Research edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer. Leeds, The Disability Press, pp. 15-31.

• Oliver, M. (1999) Final accounts and the Parasite People, in M. Corker & S. Fremch (Eds) Disability Discourse, pp. 183–191 (Buckingham, Open University Press.

• Oliver, M., (2003), Doing Disability Research Two: Emancipatory Reseach (unit 6), Culture, researching disability and changing practice (CD rom Module Four) for MA Disability Studies(DL),Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds,UK.

• Papadopoulos A.(1997), An Analysis of support room provision in Greek primary schools, unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UK.

• Parker, I. (1997). Psychoanalytic Culture. London: Sage.Pelissier Cathrine(1991) The Anthropology of Teaching and Learning, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20:75-95.

• Peters S. (1996). The politics of disability identity. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights, 215-234. New York: Pergamon.

• Peters, S. (2007). A historical analysis of international inclusive education policy and individuals with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 18, no. 2: 98–108.

• Peters, S., and L. Fendler. (2003). Disability, flanerie, and the spectacle of normalcy. In Dangerous encounters: Genealogy and ethnography, ed. M. Tamboukou and S.J. Ball, 111–32. New York: Peter Lang.

• Peters, S., Gabel, S. and Symeonidou, S. (2009) ‘Resistance, transformation and the politics of hope: imagining a way forward for the disabled people’s movement’, Disability & Society,24:5,543 _ 556

• Pihlaja, Paivi (2008), ‘Behave yourseld!” Examining meanings assigned to children with socio-emotional difficulties, Disability and Society, 23(1): 5-15.

• Pitt, V. (2003). Integration versus segregation: The experience of a group of disabled students moving from mainstream to school into special needs further education. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.

• Player, J. (1984). The amorphous school. In Defining the Curriculum: Histories and Ethnographies, ed. I F Goodson, S J Ball, pp. 219–38. London; Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

• Powell, J. (2003) Constructing disability and social inequality early in the life course: the case of special education in Germany and the US. Disability Studies Quarterly, 23 (2): 57–75.

• Predaswat, Pimpawun (1992) Khi Thut, “The Disease of Social Loathing”: An Anthropology of the Stigma of Leprosy in Rural Northeast Thailand.PhD, University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley.

• Prewitt, K. (2005), April). Demography and democracy. Εισήγηση στο συνέδριο της American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

• Priestley, M. (1999). Discourse and identity: Disabled children in mainstream high schools. In Disability discourse, ed. M. Corker and S. French, 92–102. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

• Priestley, M. (2001). Disability and the life course: Global perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27, no. 2&3: 274-284.

• Priestley, M. and Davis, J M (1999) In and out of childhood: disabled children in adult worlds paper to be presented at the ‘Mind the Gap’ conference University of Leicester, September 1999.

• Pristley, M., Corker, M. & Watson, N. (2000) Un. nished business: disabled children and disability identities, Disability Studies Quarterly, 19

• Probyn E.,(2004), Blush: Faces of Shame Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

• Rabinow, P. (1986) Respresentations as social facts: modernity & post-modernity in anthropology, in: G.E. Marcus & I. Clifford (Eds) Writing Culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 234–261 (Berkeley, University of California Press).

• Rabinow, P. (Ed.) (1984). The Foucault Reader (London, Peregrine).

• Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

• Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions and their influence on identity constructions. Disability and Society 17: 493–508.

• Reindall, S. M. (1999). Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability & Society, 14(3), 353–367.Ribbens, J. (1990) ‘Interviewing- an “Unnatural Situation”?’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 12 (6): 579-92.

• Ridler, K. (1996). ‘If Not the Words: Shared Practical Activity and Friendship in Fieldwork’, in M. Jackson (ed.) Things As They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology, pp. 238–58. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

• Rockwell, E. (2000). Teaching genres: a Bakhtinian approach. Anthropology of Educationion Quarterly, 31(3):260–82.

• Rogoff, B. et al. (2003). ‘Firsthand Learning Through Intent Participation’, Annual Review of Psychology 54: 175–203.

• Rolph, S., D. Atkinson, M. Nind, and J. Welshman, eds. (2005). Witnesses to change: Families, learning difficulties and history. Kidderminster, UK: Bild.

• Rorty, R. (1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, Princeton University Press).

• Rosaldo, M. (1984). ‘Toward an Anthropology of Self and Feeling’, in R. Shweder and R. LeVine (eds) Culture

• Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, pp. 137–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

• Rose N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society 22(3): 283-99.

• Rose N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society 25(3): 327–56.

• Rose, G. A. & John, A. M. (2003) A focus group investigation into young children’s understanding of mental health and their views on appropriate services for their age group, Child, Care,Health and Development, 29(6), 545–550.

• Rose, R. (1999) Children’s rights and adult responsibilities. In D. Matheson and I. Grosvenor (eds), An Introduction to the Study of Education (London: David Fulton), 62–78.

• Sandahl, C.(2002). “Considering Disability: Disability Phenomenology’s Role in Revolutionizing Theatrical Space.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 16.2: 17-32.

• Sangren, P. Steven .(2001). ‘Fathers and Sons in a Patrilineal Mode of Production of Desire: Preliminary Analysis of the Story of Nezha from Fengshen Yanyi’, pp. 186–223 in Chinese Sociologics. London: Athlone Press.

• Sapey, B., J. Stewart, and G. Donaldson. (2005). Increases in wheelchair use and perceptions of disablement. Disability & Society 20, no. 5: 489–507.

• Sartre J. P. (1966), Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (New York: Washington Square.

• Schutte, Ofelia. (2000). Cultural alterity: Cross-cultural communication and feminist theory in North-South contexts. In Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural,postcolonial, and feminist world, ed. Uma Narayan and Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

• Scully, J. L..(2002). “A Postmodern Disorder: Moral Encounters with Molecular Models of Disability.” Disability/ Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory.Eds. Mairian Corker and Tom Shakespeare. London: Continuum: 48-61.

• Sebba, J. & Sachdev, D. (1997). What works in inclusive education? Ilford, UK: Barnardos.

• Seremetakis N.(2001), Toxic Beauties: Medicine Information and Body Consumption in Transnational Europe, Social Text 68, Vol. 19, No. 3, Fall 2001: 115-129.

• Shakespeare, T. 1993. Disabled people’s self-organization: A new social movement? Disability, Handicap and Society 8, no. 3: 249–64.

• Shakespeare, T. (1994). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal? Disability and Society 9: 283–99.

• Shakespeare, T. (1996) Rules of engagement: doing disability research, Disability & Society, 11, pp. 115–119.

• Shakespeare, T. (1997) Researching disabled sexuality, in: C. BARNES & G.MERCER (Eds) Doing Disability Research, pp. 177–189 (Leeds, Disability Press).

• Shakespeare, T. (2000) Help. Birmingham: Venture Press.

• Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on research with disabled children. In C. Robinson, & K. Stalker (Eds.), Growing up with disability (pp. 13–27). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

• Shakespeare, T. & Watson, N. (1999) Theoretical perspectives on research with disabled children, in: C. ROBINSON & K. STALKER (Eds) Growing Up With Disability, pp. 13–28 (London, Jessica Kingsley).

• Shakespeare, T., and Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In Research in social science and disability, Volume 2, Exploring theories and expanding methodologies, 9–28. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

• Shapiro, J. (1993) No Pity: people with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement (New York, Times Books).Shumway, D. (1989). Michel Foucault (Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia).

• Shuttleworth R. Kasnitz D. (2004). Stigma, Community, Ethnography: Joan Ablon’s Contribution to the Anthropology of Impairment-Disability, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18(2): 141-161.

• Shuttleworth, R. (2002). Defusing the adverse context of disability and desirability as a practice of the self for men with cerebral palsy. In M. Corker and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory, 112-126. London/New York: Continuum.

• Shuttleworth, R. P. (1999). Ethnographic process in anthropological research among disabled people, paper presented at the 98th American Anthropological Association Meeting, Chicago, November.

• Shuttleworth, R. P. (2001). Symbolic contexts, embodied sensitivities and the lived experience of sexually relevant, interpersonal encounters for a man with severe cerebral palsy. In L.Rogers & B. Swadener (Editors.), Semiotics and Dis/ability: Interrogating categories of difference, pp 75-95, NY: SUNY Press.

• Silvers, A. (2002). The crooked timber of humanity: Disability, ideology and the aesthetic. In M. Corker and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory, 228-244. London/New York: Continuum.

• Silvers, A. (1998) Review of Deaf and disabled or deafness disabled. Deaf Worlds 14 (3): 31–32.Simeonsson, R., Carlson, D., Huntington, G., McMillen, J. & Brent,

• J. L. (2001). Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(2), 49–63.

• Singh V &.Ghai, A. (2009), Notions of self: lived realities of children with disabilities’, Disability & Society,24(2): 129 _ 145.

• Slee, R. (1996) Inclusive schooling in Australia? Not yet! Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 19–33.

• Slee, R. (2001a) Inclusion in practice: does practice make perfect? Educational Review, 53, 113–124.

• Slee, R. (2001b) Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: the case of inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5, 167–178.

• Snyder, S L., and D. T. Mitchell, (2001). “Re-Engaging the Body: Disability Studies and the Resistance to Embodiment.” Public Culture 13.3 (Fall 2001): 367-89.

• Soder, M. (1989), Disability as a social construct: the labelling approach revisited, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 4, pp. 117± 129.

• Spindler, G. D. (Ed.). (2000). Fifty years of anthropology and education: 1950–2000. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

• Stagoll, Cliff. (2005.) Plane. In The Deleuze dictionary, ed. Adrian Parr. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

• Stanley, L. (1990). Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge.

• Steiner M. (1994) ‘When another meets another: Coming 1-to-1’. Anthropology of Work Review 11(2–3), 10–11

• Stocking, G. (1973). From chronology to ethnology: James Cowles Prichard and British anthropology 1800–1850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

• Stone, E. & Pristley,M. (1996) Parasites, pawns and partners: disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers, British Journal of Sociology, 47, pp. 699–716.

• Strathern, M. (1987). The limits of auto-anthropology. In Anthropology at home, edited by A. Jackson, 16-37. London: Tavistock.

• Strathern, M. (1996) Cutting the network, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute , vol. 2, pp. 517-535.Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability and Society, 15(4), 569–582.

• Tang, Jung-Chang, Tina G. Patterson, and Craig H. Kennedy. (2003). Identifying specific sensory modalities maintaining the stereotypy of students with profound multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 24: 433–51.

• Tedlock, B., Ethnography and Ethnographic Representation, in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (2001). The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

• Tentomas, L., (2007), An Ethnographic Study of Students Experiences of Life in a Special High School in Greece. MA Thesis, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, UK.

• Thomas, C. (2001). Feminism and disability: The theoretical and political significance of the personal and the experiential. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability, politics and the struggle for change, 48-58. London: David Fulton Publishers, Ltd.

• Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

• Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society 19, no. 6: 569–83.

• Thomas, C. (2006). Disability and gender: Reflections and theory and research. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8, nos. 2–3: 177–85.

• Thompson H. Richard (2003) Basing Educational Anthropology on the Education of Anthropologists: Can Bilingualism and Biculturalism Promote the Fundamental Goals of Anthropology Better than Multiculturalism? Anthrology of Education Quarterly,34(1): 96-107.

• Thomson G. R. (2007), Shape Structures Story: Fresh and Feisty Stories about Disability. Narative, 15(1): 114-123.

• Thomson, R. G., (1997) Extraordinary bodies. Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature (New York, Columbia University Press).

• Thomson, R. G., (2001) Seeing the Disabled. Visual rhetorics of disability in popular photography, in: P. K. Longmore & L. Umansky (eds) The New Disability History: American perspectives (New York, New York University Press), pp. 335–374.

• Tomlinson, S. (1982). A sociology of special education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Tomlinson, S. (1994) Educational Reform and its Consequences (London: IPPR/Rivers Oram).

• Tomlinson, S. (2001). Sociological perspectives on special and inclusive education. Support for Learning, 16(4), 191–192.

• Tregaskis, C., (2004a). Social model theories and non-disabled people: some possibilities for connection. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. Leeds: The Disability Press.

• Tregaskis, C., (2004b). Constructions of disability: Researching the interface between disabled and nondisabled people. London: Routledge.

• Tregaskis, Claire and Goodley, Dan (2005) ‘Disability Research by Disabled and Non-Disabled People: Towards a Relational Methodology of Research Production’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5),363-374.

• Tremain S. (2006), Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero, Hypatia,21(1): 36-52.

• Tremain, S. (ed.) (2005) Foucault and the Government of Disability (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).

• Triano, S. (2000) Categorical eligibility for special education: the enshrinement of the medical model in disability policy. Disability Studies Quarterly, 20 (4):399–412.

• Tripathi, I., and A. Agarwal. (2000). Chronic illness, symptoms and efficacy in children as related to some psychological characteristics of mothers. Psychology and Developing Societies 12, no. 1: 31–42.

• Tuval, S. & Orr, E, (2009)’Social representations of inclusion and stratification: ethnographic research within two Israeli elementary schools’,Disability & Society,24(4):503-516.

• Tyler, S.A. (1986) Post-modern ethnography: from document of the occult to occult document, in: G.E.MARCUS & I. CLIFFORD (Eds) Writing Culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 122–140 (Berkeley, University of California Press).

• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1975). Fundamental principles of disability. Ανάκτηση 21 Ιουνίου 2007 από http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/fundamental%20principles.pdf

• Vestraete, P. (2007), Towards a Disabled Past: Some preliminary thoughts about the history of disability, governmentality and experience, Educational Philosophy and Theory,Journal compilation, Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia, pp 55-63.

• Vlachou Anastassia, Didaskalou Eleni and Argyrakouli Effi (2006), Preferences of students with general learning difficulties for different service delivery modes, European Journal of Special Needs Education 21(2), pp. 201–216.

• Vlachou Balafouti, A. (2001) The process of change and the politics of resistance in educational contexts. In L. Barton (ed.), Disability, Politics & the Struggle for Change (London: David Fulton), 110–125.

• Vlachou, A. (2004) ‘Education and inclusive policy-making: implications for research and practice’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8:1, 3 _ 21.

• Waksler, F. (Ed.) (1991) Studying the social world of children: sociological readings (London, Falmer).

• Walker A.,(1997), Introduction: The Strategy of Inequality, in Walker A. & Walker C (eds), Britain Divided: The Growth of Social Exclusion in the 1980s and 1990s, London, Child Poverty Action Group, pp. 1-13.

• Ware, Jean. (2003). Creating a responsive environment for people with profound and multiple learning difficulties, 2nd,ed. London. David Fulton.

• Watermeyer, B. (2002). Blindness, attachment and self: Psychoanalysis and ideology. Free Associations 49: 335–52.

• Watermeyer, B. (2006). Disability and psychoanalysis. In Disability and social change: A South African agenda, ed.

• B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, M. Schneider, T. Lorenzo, and M. Priestley, 31–43. Pretoria: HSRC Press.

• Watermeyer, B. and Swartz, L.(2008).’Conceptualising the psycho-emotional aspects of disability and impairment: the distortion of personal and psychic boundaries’, Disability & Society,23:6,599 _ 610.

• Watson S. (2000). Foucault and the study of social policy. Στο Rethinking social policy, eds G Lewis, S Gewirtz and J Clarke, 66–77. London: Open University/Sage Publications.

• Watson, N., T. Shakespeare, S. Cunningham-Burley, C. Barnes, M. Corker, J. Davis, and M. Priestley. (1999). Life as a ‘disabled’ child: A qualitative study of young people’sexperiences and perspectives, Final Report. Edinburgh and Leeds: Universities of Edinburghand Leeds.

• Wedell, K., Stevens, C., & Walker, T. (2000). Points from the SENCo-Forum: Putting ‘inclusion’ into practice. British Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 100.

• Weir, Lorna. (1996). Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy and Society 25, no. 3: 372–92.

• Weis L. (1985). Between Two Worlds: Black Students in an Urban Community College. Boston: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.

• Weis L. (1988). Class, Race and Gender in American Education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

• Welsh, P. and Brassart, J. (2002) Poverty, deprivation and the politics of educational inclusion in Thanet and Lille. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6, 127–141.

• Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.

• Whitty, G. (1997) Creating quasi-markets in England: a review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of Research in Education, 22, 1–45.

• Wiepzbicka Anna, (1996) Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press

• Wiepzbicka Anna,(2004), Emotion and Culture: Arguing with Martha Nussbaum. Εthos, 31(4): 577-600.

• Wikan, U. (1992). ‘Beyond the Words: The Power of Resonance’, American Ethnologist 19(3): 460–82.

• Wilde, Oscar. (1908). Lady Windemere’s Fan. London: Thoemmes. Reprint, London: Routledge, 1993.

• Willersley, R. (2004). ‘Not Animal, Not Not-Animal: Hunting, Imitation and Empathetic Knowledge Among the Siberian Yukaghirs’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(3): 629–52.

• Williams, R. (1977).. Marxism and literature. London: Oxford University Press.

• Wishart, J. & Manning, G. (1996). Trainee teachers’ attitudes to inclusive education for children with Down’s syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40(1), 56–65.

• Wispé, L. (1986). ‘The Distinction Between Sympathy and Empathy: To Call Forth a Concept, A Word is Needed’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(2): 314–21.

• Wolfenberger, W. (1992). A Brief Introduction to Social Role Valorisation: as a higher-order concept for structuring human service, 2nd edn (Burwood, Deakin University).

• Woodtll, G. (1994) The social semiotics of disability, στο: M.H. RIOUSE & M. BACH (Eds)Disability is not Measles, pp. 207–216 (North York: Ontario, L’Institut Roeher).

• Yanal, Robert J. (1999). Paradoxes of Emotion and Fiction, University Park PA, Pennsylvania, Penn-State Press.

• Yon D. A., (1999), Pedagogy and the ‘problem’ of difference: on reading community in ‘The Darker Side of Black. Qualitative. Studies in Education 12(6):623–41.

• Yon D. A.,(2003), Highlights and Overview of the History of Educational Anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, pp. 411-29.

• Yon D.A., (2000), Elusive Culture: Schooling,Race and Identity in Global Times. Albany: SUNY Press.

• Yude, C. & Goodman, R. (1999). Peer problems of 9- to 11-year old children with hemiplegia in mainstream schools. Can these be predicted? Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 4–8.

• Zola, I.K. (1991). Bringing our bodies and ourselves back in: re_ ections on a past, present, and future ‘medical sociology’, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 32(3), pp. 1–16.

• Zomiou-Sideri A., Deropoulou-Deroub E., Karagianni P. and Spandagou I., (2006), Inclusive discourse in Greece: strong voices, weak policies, International Journal of Inclusive Education, Vol. 10, No. 2–3, pp. 279–291.

• Zuriff G.E. (1996) The myths of learning disabilities: the social construction of a disorder. Public Affairs Quarterly, 10 (4): 395–405.